Candidates take a short voice interview when it suits them. The same questions for everyone, scored against your rubric, reviewed by a person.
Built Shiplane's first volume forecast. Sales now plans capacity from it, though she couldn't yet say by how much it helped.
Strong answer looks like: names the users, the decision the model changed and a measured result.
Ratings are suggestions. A recruiter listens and decides who moves on.
Start from the role's brief, edit the questions, and say what a strong and a weak answer sound like.
The invite and the screen both say an AI interviewer asks the questions and a person reviews the answers. Candidates confirm that before starting, and can ask for an adjustment or a person instead.
Every rating sits next to a summary of the answer it rates, so a reviewer can disagree with any of them in seconds.
Emoti sorts the results; it does not reject anyone. A recruiter listens and makes the call.

Everyone gets the same ones, in the same order, with follow-ups only where you allow them.
You write what a strong and a weak answer sound like. Emoti applies it and shows its working.
Results never move a candidate forward or out on their own.
Yes. The invite says so, the welcome page says so, and candidates confirm it before the first question.
They can ask for more time, a different format or a conversation with a person, and the request goes straight to the recruiter.
Ratings are based on what the answer says against your rubric. Speech is transcribed first, and transcription can make more mistakes for some speakers, so reviewers see a summary of every answer next to its rating and make the decision themselves.


