Recruiting terms, defined
45 terms recruiters, hiring managers and candidates meet, each defined in a sentence or two you can use on its own.
A
- Adverse impact
A substantially lower selection rate for one group, defined by race, sex or ethnicity, compared with another at a step in the hiring process. In the US it is often first checked with the four-fifths rule.
Adverse impact can happen without any intent to discriminate, which is why outcomes have to be measured rather than assumed. Check each stage of the process separately, and be careful when the numbers are small.
Read more. Related: four-fifths rule, bias audit, pass-through rate
- AI voice screen
A first-round interview in which an AI interviewer asks a fixed set of questions by voice and each answer is rated against a rubric the hiring team wrote. In Emoti, a recruiter reviews the results and makes every decision.
Candidates usually take it from a link at a time that suits them. A well-designed screen tells candidates an AI is asking the questions, explains who reviews the answers, and offers a way to ask for an adjustment.
Read more. Related: phone screen, rubric, structured interview, scorecard
- Anchored rating scale
A rating scale in which each point is described by an example or description of the answer that earns it, so interviewers rate answers against the same standard.
Reviews of the research find that anchored scales make structured interview ratings more reliable and more valid. Anchoring every point on the scale, not only the ends, gives raters the most guidance.
Read more. Related: rubric, structured interview, scorecard, calibration
- Applicant tracking system
Software that stores job openings, applications and each candidate's progress through the hiring stages, often called an ATS. It is usually the system of record for hiring decisions.
Related: requisition, job post, source of hire
- Automated employment decision tool
A term from New York City's Local Law 144 for a computer-based tool that uses machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics or artificial intelligence to substantially assist or replace discretionary hiring or promotion decisions.
Employers using one to assess candidates for jobs in New York City must have an independent bias audit done within a year before use, publish a summary of the results, and notify candidates who live in the city 10 business days before use.
Read more. Related: bias audit, adverse impact, four-fifths rule
B
- Bias audit
An impartial evaluation of a hiring tool's outcomes by group. Under New York City's Local Law 144, an independent auditor calculates selection or scoring rates and impact ratios by sex, race and ethnicity, and their intersections.
Read more. Related: adverse impact, four-fifths rule, automated employment decision tool
- Boolean search
A search that combines keywords with operators such as AND, OR and NOT, and quotation marks for exact phrases, to find profiles or resumes.
It is precise but literal: it finds the words people used, not necessarily the skills they have.
Related: sourcing, talent pool
C
- Calibration
Aligning interviewers, or a recruiter and a hiring manager, on what a good candidate looks like, usually by rating the same examples together and discussing the differences.
In sourcing, calibration often means reviewing the first few profiles together before searching further.
Related: debrief, rubric, intake meeting
- Candidate experience
How candidates perceive an employer's hiring process, from the first message to the final decision, including its speed, clarity, fairness and respect.
Related: reply rate, offer acceptance rate, reasonable adjustment
- Competency
A skill, behavior or kind of knowledge the job requires, defined clearly enough to be assessed, such as owning production systems or negotiating contracts.
Read more. Related: rubric, structured interview, scorecard
- Counteroffer
An offer a candidate's current employer makes to keep them after they receive or accept another offer, usually more pay or a new role.
Read more. Related: offer acceptance rate, notice period
D
- Debrief
The meeting after interviews where interviewers share their ratings and evidence and the hiring team decides. It works best when every interviewer has recorded ratings independently beforehand.
Read more. Related: scorecard, calibration, panel interview
E
- Evidence
In Emoti, the line of profile or transcript text behind each judgment, shown next to the judgment so a person can check it.
In sourcing, every criterion on the fit strip carries an evidence line, such as the employer where a skill was used or a note that the skill isn't in the profile. In interview notes, evidence is a quote linked to its moment in the call.
Read more. Related: fit strip, must-have criterion, transcript highlight
F
- First line
In outreach, the opening sentence of the first message, written for one person from their own work. Emoti drafts one per person and a recruiter approves it before anything is sent.
Read more. Related: outreach sequence, reply rate, passive candidate
- Fit strip
Emoti's row of marks, one per search criterion, showing whether a candidate meets, partly meets, misses or lacks information for each criterion, with the evidence behind each mark.
Met is worth 1, partly met 0.5, not enough information 0.25 and missing 0. Must-haves count double, a missing must-have caps the score at 54 out of 100, and a partly met must-have caps it at 74.
Read more. Related: evidence, must-have criterion, nice-to-have criterion, look-alike search
- Four-fifths rule
A guideline in the US Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures: a selection rate for any race, sex or ethnic group below four-fifths of the highest group's rate is generally regarded as evidence of adverse impact.
It is a rule of thumb, not a legal verdict. The guidelines note that smaller differences can still matter when they are statistically and practically significant, and larger ones may not when they rest on small numbers.
Read more. Related: adverse impact, bias audit, pass-through rate
H
- Hiring brief
A short, plain-language description of who a team wants to hire and how it will recognize them: must-haves, nice-to-haves, evidence, location, level, pay range and deal-breakers.
Read more. Related: intake meeting, must-have criterion, nice-to-have criterion, job description
I
- Intake meeting
The meeting where a recruiter and hiring manager agree on a role before the search starts: what the person will do, the must-haves, where to look and the interview process.
Read more. Related: hiring brief, requisition, calibration
J
- Job description
A document describing a job's purpose, responsibilities and requirements. It is usually written for candidates and internal records, and is broader than a hiring brief.
Related: job post, hiring brief, requisition
- Job post
A public advertisement for an open role, published on a careers page or job board and written to attract applicants. Some places require it to include a pay range.
California, for example, requires employers with 15 or more employees to include the pay scale in job postings.
Related: job description, applicant tracking system, source of hire
L
- Look-alike search
In Emoti, a search that builds criteria from one person's profile, such as the same discipline, region, years of experience and top skills, and ranks others against them.
The criteria are visible and editable, which matters because copying the shape of one profile can also copy its blind spots.
Read more. Related: sourcing, fit strip, talent pool
M
- Market map
In Emoti, a view of where people in one discipline and region work, grouped by company, with how many there are, how many are senior, their median years of experience and their most common skills.
Related: sourcing, talent pool, look-alike search
- Must-have criterion
A requirement a team would turn down an otherwise excellent candidate for lacking. In Emoti, must-haves count double, and missing one caps a candidate's score at 54.
Keep the list short: each extra must-have shrinks the pool. A good test is to ask whether you would really turn down a strong candidate who lacked it.
Read more. Related: nice-to-have criterion, fit strip, hiring brief
N
- Nice-to-have criterion
A requirement that would make a candidate stand out but whose absence wouldn't rule them out. In Emoti, nice-to-haves count once and never cap a score.
Read more. Related: must-have criterion, fit strip, hiring brief
- Notetaker
Software that joins a call, records and transcribes it, and drafts notes. Emoti's notetaker writes notes in the template chosen for each kind of call and, by default, tells everyone the call is recorded.
Read more. Related: transcript highlight, debrief, scorecard
- Notice period
The time a person must work, or be paid for, after resigning from their current job before they can start a new one, set by their contract or local law.
Read more. Related: counteroffer, phone screen, time to hire
O
- Offer acceptance rate
Offers accepted divided by offers made in a period, leaving out offers still waiting for an answer.
Read more. Related: time to hire, counteroffer, candidate experience
- Outreach sequence
A planned series of messages and tasks, such as emails, LinkedIn messages, calls and waits, sent to a candidate over days or weeks until they reply or the sequence ends.
In Emoti, any reply stops the sequence for that person, and emails go out only on weekdays, within a sending window and under a daily limit per mailbox.
Read more. Related: first line, reply rate, passive candidate
P
- Panel interview
An interview in which several interviewers meet a candidate together, or a set of interviews with different interviewers. Each panel member should rate the candidate independently before any discussion.
Read more. Related: debrief, structured interview, scorecard
- Pass-through rate
The share of candidates at one stage of hiring who move to the next, for example people advanced after a screen divided by people screened.
Comparing pass-through rates by group at each stage is one of the simplest ways to spot adverse impact.
Read more. Related: adverse impact, four-fifths rule, time to hire
- Passive candidate
A person who isn't actively looking for a new job but might consider the right one. Sourcing and outreach are how teams reach them.
Read more. Related: sourcing, outreach sequence, first line
- Phone screen
A short first conversation that checks a candidate's motivation, must-haves and logistics before a full interview. It can be run by a recruiter or as an AI voice screen.
Read more. Related: ai voice screen, structured interview, notice period
Q
- Quality of hire
A measure of how well hires turn out, using signals such as performance ratings, hiring manager satisfaction or retention after a set period. There is no single standard definition.
Read more. Related: source of hire, time to fill
R
- Reasonable adjustment
A change to a hiring process or job that removes a disadvantage for a disabled person, such as extra time, a different format or a human interviewer. US law calls it a reasonable accommodation.
Great Britain's Equality Act 2010 places a duty on employers to make reasonable adjustments, and the US Americans with Disabilities Act requires reasonable accommodations for qualified applicants unless they would cause undue hardship.
Read more. Related: ai voice screen, candidate experience, structured interview
- Requisition
An approved request to hire for a role, usually with a budget, level and headcount, often shortened to req. Time to fill is usually counted from the day it opens.
Related: time to fill, intake meeting, applicant tracking system
- Rubric
A written guide for rating answers: for each question or competency, what a strong, middling and weak answer contains.
Read more. Related: anchored rating scale, scorecard, competency, structured interview
S
- Scorecard
The record of one interviewer's or one screen's ratings for a candidate, competency by competency or question by question, with the evidence for each rating.
Read more. Related: rubric, debrief, anchored rating scale
- Source of hire
Where each hire came from, such as sourcing, referrals, the careers page, job boards or agencies, usually reported as each source's share of hires.
Read more. Related: pass-through rate, quality of hire, sourcing
- Sourcing
Finding and identifying people who could fit a role, especially people who haven't applied, through searches, referrals and research.
Read more. Related: boolean search, talent pool, passive candidate, look-alike search
- Structured interview
An interview in which every candidate is asked the same job-related questions and every answer is rated against the same written standard.
Research consistently finds that structured interviews predict job performance better than unstructured conversations, and a 2022 re-analysis ranked them first among common selection methods.
Read more. Related: rubric, anchored rating scale, competency, panel interview
T
- Talent pool
A saved group of potential candidates, such as past finalists or people found in sourcing, kept for current or future roles.
Related: sourcing, passive candidate, market map
- Time to fill
The time from opening a role, usually the day the requisition is approved, to the day a candidate accepts an offer.
Read more. Related: time to hire, requisition, pass-through rate
- Time to hire
The time from the day the eventual hire entered the pipeline, by applying or being sourced, to the day they accepted the offer.
Read it next to time to fill. A long time to fill with a short time to hire means the right person arrived late, which usually points to sourcing rather than the interview process.
Read more. Related: time to fill, offer acceptance rate, pass-through rate